Datasheet
Amelanchier spicata (dwarf serviceberry)
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate report
Identity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Amelanchier spicata (Lam.) K. Koch, 1869
Preferred Common Name
Other Scientific Names
- Amelanchier humilis Wieg.
- Amelanchier humilis var. campestris E.L.Nielsen
- Amelanchier humilis var. compacta E.L.Nielsen
- Amelanchier humilis var. exserrata E.L.Nielsen
- Amelanchier murcronata E.L.Nielsen
- Amelanchier ovalis Borkh. non Medicus
- Amelanchier stolonifera auct.
- Amelancus spicata (Decne.) Vollm.
- Ariona ovalis
- Crataegus spicata Lam., 1783
- Pyrus ovalis Willd.
- Amelanchier canadensis subsp. spicata (Lam.) Á. Löve & D. Löve, 1961
International Common Names
- English: dwarf serviceberry; low juneberry; low serviceberry; thicket shadbush
- French: amélanchier à feuilles rondes; Amélanchier en épis
Local Common Names
- Estonia: tähktoompihlakas
- Finland: isotuomipihlaja
- Germany: Besen-felsenbirne; Felsenbirne, Ährige; Felsenbirne, Besen-
- Italy: nespolino a foglie ronde
- Latvia: varpaina koriinte
- Lithuania: varpiine medlieva
- Netherlands: krenteboompje, aar-
- Norway: blåhegg; junisøtmispel
- Poland: swidosliwka klosowa
- Sweden: häggmispel
EPPO code
- AMESP (Amelanchier spicata)
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of pageA. spicata is cultivated for ornamental purposes and has become naturalized in northern Europe where it is considered invasive. It has been identified by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) as one of a number of species posing an important threat to plant health, the environment and biodiversity in the EPPO region.
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Dicotyledonae
- Order: Rosales
- Family: Rosaceae
- Genus: Amelanchier
- Species: Amelanchier spicata
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pageThe genus Amelanchier is taxonomically complex and contains many hybrids. Various botanical works cite different origins for A. spicata. Chittenden (1956) lists A. x spicata as a hybrid probably between Amelanchier oblongifolia and Amelanchier stolonifera, and Krüssmann (1984) states that until recently, A. spicata was erroneously considered to be a hybrid between Amelanchier canadensis and Amelanchier ovalis.
Tutin et al. (1968) suggest A. spicata is conspecific with Amelanchier humilis from northeastern North America. However, Schroeder (1970) does not agree that A. spicata is conspecific with either A. humilis or A. stolonifera.
The correct name for A. spicata is much debated; see the University of Maine’s website on Amelanchier Systematics and Evolution for further discussion (http://biology.umaine.edu/Amelanchier/spi.html).
Description
Top of page
Amelanchier is a genus of deciduous shrubs and small trees. A. spicata has suckers that grow from the base forming a thicket of stems.
Stems 1-30, 0.3-2.0 m; twigs glabrous at flowering. Leaves oval to orbiculate, 1.5-6.5 x 1-4 cm. Inflorescences (4)5-7(-10)-flowered, 1.5-4.0 cm. Flowers with 5 white to ivory petals, 6-10 x 2.5-4.0(-5.0) mm. Stamens 10-20, styles 5. Fruits purple-black, 7-12 mm diameter (simplified from University of Maine, 2009).
Plant Type
Top of pageBroadleaved
Perennial
Seed propagated
Shrub
Vegetatively propagated
Distribution
Top of pageAccording to Schroeder (1970), A. spicata, naturalized in Europe along with Amelanchier confusa and Amelanchier lamarckii, is undoubtedly of North American origin, but is not known as a distinct species in North America; it is instead considered as a microspecies. Schroeder does not accept the suggestion that the naturalized Amelanchier might be hybrids that have arisen in European gardens. Kabuce (2006) provides a map of the distribution of A. spicata in North America.
A. spicata is regarded as invasive in much of northern Europe including Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania and Sweden, and is potentially invasive in Norway (NOBANIS, 2009). Present in both gardens and in the wild, the species has spread rapidly particularly in Latvia and Denmark (Kabuce, 2006).
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
| Country | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | | References | Notes | NORTH AMERICA |
| Canada | Present | | | | |
natural
| Tropicos, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| -New Brunswick | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Newfoundland and Labrador | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Nova Scotia | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Ontario | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Prince Edward Island | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Quebec | Present | | | | | | Tropicos, 2009 | |
| USA | Present | | | | |
natural
| Tropicos, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| -Alabama | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Connecticut | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Delaware | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Georgia | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Illinois | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Iowa | Present | | | | | | Tropicos, 2009; University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Maine | Present | | | | | | Tropicos, 2009; University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Maryland | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Massachusetts | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Michigan | Present | | | | | | Tropicos, 2009; University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Minnesota | Present | | | | | | Tropicos, 2009; University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -New Hampshire | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -New Jersey | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -New York | Present | | | | | | Tropicos, 2009; University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -North Carolina | Present | | | | | | Tropicos, 2009; University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -North Dakota | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Ohio | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Pennsylvania | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Rhode Island | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -South Carolina | Present | | | | | | Tropicos, 2009; University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Tennessee | Present | | | | | | Tropicos, 2009 | |
| -Vermont | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Virginia | Present | | | | | | Tropicos, 2009; University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -West Virginia | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
| -Wisconsin | Present | | | | | | University of Maine, 2009 | |
EUROPE |
| Austria | Present | | Introduced | | | | Kurtto, 2009; NOBANIS, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| Belgium | Present | | | | | | EPPO, 2014; Kurtto, 2009 | |
| Bulgaria | Present | | | | | | EPPO, 2014 | |
| Czech Republic | Present | | Introduced | | | | Kurtto, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| Denmark | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | | Kurtto, 2009; NOBANIS, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| Estonia | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | | Kurtto, 2009; NOBANIS, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| Finland | Restricted distribution | | Introduced | | Invasive | | Kurtto, 2009; NOBANIS, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| France | Present | | Introduced | | | | Kurtto, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| Germany | Present | | Introduced | | | | Kurtto, 2009; NOBANIS, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| Latvia | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | | Kurtto, 2009; NOBANIS, 2009; Rurane et al., 2004; EPPO, 2014 | |
| Lithuania | Widespread | | Introduced | | Invasive | | Gudzinskas, 2005; Kurtto, 2009; NOBANIS, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| Netherlands | Present | | Introduced | | | | Kurtto, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| Norway | Widespread | | Introduced | | | | Kurtto, 2009; NOBANIS, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | Common, potentially invasive |
| Poland | Present | | Introduced | | | | Kurtto, 2009; NOBANIS, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| Russian Federation | Present | | | | Not invasive | | NOBANIS, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | Very common in European part of Russia |
| -Central Russia | Present | | | | | | EPPO, 2014 | |
| Sweden | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | | Kurtto, 2009; NOBANIS, 2009; EPPO, 2014 | |
| UK | Present | | | | | | RHS, 2009 | Available from nurseries via RHS Plant Finder |
| Ukraine | Present | | | | | | EPPO, 2014 | |
Risk of Introduction
Top of page
Because A. spicata is a favoured ornamental, the risk of deliberate introduction is high.
Erkamo (1956, in Kowarik, 1995) analysed the capability of woody species to regenerate by seed and thus spread further. From the beginning to the middle of the 1900s, a number of species, including A. spicata, extended their regeneration front several latitudes northwards.
Habitat
Top of pageA. spicata is found in forests, dunes, rocky areas and riverbanks of northeastern North America (Krüssmann, 1984).
Habitat List
Top of page| Category | Habitat | Presence | Status | | Littoral |
| Coastal dunes | Present, no further details | |
| Terrestrial-managed |
| Cultivated / agricultural land | Present, no further details | |
| Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | |
| Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | |
| Urban / peri-urban areas | Present, no further details | |
| Terrestrial-natural/semi-natural |
| Natural forests | Present, no further details | |
| Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | |
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageAssociations
In Latvia, A. spicata was found to be associated with Quercus robus, Padus avium, Sorbus aucuparia and Acer platanoides (Rurane et al., 2004).
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of pageFire blight caused by Erwinia amylovora has been reported on serviceberries (Amelanchier spp.) (Van der Zwet and Keil, 1979 in Momol and Aldwinckle, 2000).
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pageIntroduced intentionally via horticulture, the seed of A. spicata is dispersed naturally by small mammals, bears and birds (Birkmane et al., 1957 in Kabuce, 2006). The plant also spreads vegetatively, forming dense stands.
Environmental Impact
Top of pageKabuce (2006) suggests that the current distributions of A. spicata should be monitored and controlled especially in areas affected by eutrophication.
Impact: Biodiversity
Top of page
A. spicata is said to be invading coastal areas in the Baltic region, altering the structure of both plant communities and the landscape. Spread is faster than that of other species due to the availability of suitable ecological conditions and the poor competition from other species (Kabuce et al., 2006 and references therein).
Risk and Impact Factors
Top of pageImpact outcomes
- Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
Invasiveness
- Has high genetic variability
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Long lived
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Reproduces asexually
- Tolerant of shade
Likelihood of entry/control
- Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
Uses
Top of pageAmelanchier is an easily-cultivated and attractive tree species introduced via horticulture. A. spicata is used as an ornamental in parks, and along roads and hedgerows. It is also planted in windbreaks (Kabuce, 2006).
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of page
Amelanchier canadensis, a native of the eastern USA, is closely related to A. spicata (Tutin et al., 1968). A. spicata is also similar to Amelanchier humilis in habit, but prefers acidic soils whereas A. humilis is a calciphile (University of Maine, 2009). A detailed key to the naturalized European species A. lamarckii, Amelanchier confusa and Amelanchier spicata can be found in Schroeder (1970). See also the datasheet on A. lamarckii in this Compendium.
Prevention and Control
Top of pageA. spicata is on the EPPO list of invasive alien plants.
References
Top of pageBinggeli P, 1998. Plants of the pacific northwest in Western Europe. Plants of the pacific northwest in Western Europe. unpaginated. [Botanical Electronis News, No. 195.]
Chittenden FJ, 1956. Dictionary of Gardening. RHS Vol. 1, 2nd edition. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 512 pp.
EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
Global Compendium of Weeds, 2009. Amelanchier spicata (Rosaceae). Amelanchier spicata (Rosaceae). unpaginated. http://www.hear.org/gcw/species/amelanchier_spicata/
Gudzinskas Z, 2005. Case studies on the alien flora of the vicinity of cemeteries in Lithuania. Latvijas Universitates Raksti, 685:21-37.
Kabuce N, 2006. NOBANIS - invasive alien species fact sheet - Heracleum sosnowskyi. Online Database of the North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species - NOBANIS. http://www.nobanis.org
Kowarik I, 1995. Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. In: Pysek P, Prach K, Rejmane M, Wade M, eds. Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. Workshop held at Kostelec nad Cernymi lesy, Czech Republic, 16-19 September 1993. Amsterdam, Netherlands; SPB Academic Publishing, 15-38.
Krüssmann G, 1984. Amelanchier Medic. - Rosaceae. Manual of cultivated broad-leaved trees and shrubs. Vol. 1. Amelanchier Medic. - Rosaceae. Manual of cultivated broad-leaved trees and shrubs. Vol. 1. London, UK: A-D. BT Batsford Ltd., 141-149.
Kurtto A, 2009. Rosaceae (proparte majore). Euro+Med Plantbase - the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. unpaginated. http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/
Momol MT, Aldwinckle HS, 2000. Genetic diversity and host range of Erwinia amylovora. In: Fire blight: the disease and its causative agent, Erwinia amylovora [ed. by Vanneste, J. L.]. Wallingford, UK: CABI, 55-72. http://www.cabi.org/CABeBooks/default.aspx?site=107&page=45&LoadModule=PDFHier&BookID=46
Momol MT, Aldwinckle HS, 2000. Genetic diversity and host range of Erwinia amylovora. In: Vanneste JL, ed. Fire blight the disease and its causative agent, Erwinia amylovora. Wallingford, Oxon UK: CABI Publishing, 55-72.
NOBANIS, 2009. European network on invasive alien species. European network on invasive alien species. unpaginated. http://www.nobanis.org
RHS, 2009. Amelanchier general. Amelanchier general. The Royal Horticultural Society Horticultural Database, unpaginated. http://www.rhs.org.uk
Rurane I, ZnotiHa V, Brumelis G, Tabors G, Balodis VA, 2004. Distribution of Amelanchier spicata in Jurmala in relation to environmental factors. Distribution of Amelanchier spicata in Jurmala in relation to environmental factors. Latvijas Universitate, 39 pp. http://piekraste.daba.lv/LV/peetiijumi/Amelanchier_spicata_izplatiiba.pdf
Schroeder FG, 1970. Exotic Amelanchier species naturalized in Europe and their occurrence in Great Britain. Watsonia, 8:155-162.
Tropicos, 2009. Tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical Garden. Tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical Garden. unpaginated. http://www.tropicos.org
Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burge NA, Moore DM, Valnete DH, Walter SM, Webb DA, 1968. Flora Europaea. Vol. 2. Rosaceae to Umbelliferae [ed. by TUTIN, T. G.\ET AL.]. Cambridge University Press, London, xxvii + 455 pp.
University of Maine, 2009. Amelanchier systematics and evolution. Amelanchier systematics and evolution. unpaginated. http://biology.umaine.edu/Amelanchier/spi.html
Contributors
Top of page
05/12/09 Original text by:
Vicki Bonham, CABI, Nosworthy Way, Wallingford, Oxon OX10 8DE, UK
Distribution Maps
Top of page
- = Present, no further details
- = Evidence of pathogen
- = Widespread
- = Last reported
- = Localised
- = Presence unconfirmed
- = Confined and subject to quarantine
- = See regional map for distribution within the country
- = Occasional or few reports