Phloeomyzus passerinii (poplar woolly aphid)
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
PicturesTop of page
|Caption||Alate oviparous female of Ph. passerinii.|
|Copyright||Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura/Casale Monf. AL Italy |
|Oviparous female||Alate oviparous female of Ph. passerinii.||Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura/Casale Monf. AL Italy |
|Title||Females and larvae|
|Caption||Apterous virginoparous females and larvae of Ph. passerinii.|
|Copyright||Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura/Casale Monf. AL Italy |
|Females and larvae||Apterous virginoparous females and larvae of Ph. passerinii.||Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura/Casale Monf. AL Italy |
|Title||Colonies on bark|
|Caption||Colonies of Ph. passerinii in the crevices of the bark of a poplar tree (Populus sp.).|
|Copyright||Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura/Casale Monf. AL Italy|
|Colonies on bark||Colonies of Ph. passerinii in the crevices of the bark of a poplar tree (Populus sp.).||Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura/Casale Monf. AL Italy|
|Title||Abundant colonies on bark|
|Caption||Colonies of Ph. passerinii widely spread on the trunk of a poplar tree (Populus sp.).|
|Copyright||Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura/Casale Monf. AL Italy|
|Abundant colonies on bark||Colonies of Ph. passerinii widely spread on the trunk of a poplar tree (Populus sp.).||Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura/Casale Monf. AL Italy|
|Caption||Poplar (Populus sp.) cuttings artificially inoculated with Ph. passerinii in the laboratory.|
|Copyright||Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura/Casale Monf. AL Italy|
|Laboratory colonies||Poplar (Populus sp.) cuttings artificially inoculated with Ph. passerinii in the laboratory.||Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura/Casale Monf. AL Italy|
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Phloeomyzus passerinii (Signoret, 1875)
Preferred Common Name
Other Scientific Names
- Phloeomyzus dearborni Smith
- Phloeomyzus dubius Börner
- Phloeomyzus redelei Hille Ris Lambers
Local Common Names
- France: puceron lanigère du peuplier
- Italy: afide lanigero del pioppo
- Netherlands: schimmelluis
- Spain: afido lanigero del chopo
- PHLOPA (Phloeomyzus passerinii)
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
P. passerinii outbreaks are increasing in frequency in northern Italy (Allegro, 1997), with heavy economic losses from the death of thousands of trees and due to the need for expensive chemical control. There is evidence that in France pest populations are increasing (S Augustin, INRA Unite de Zoologie Forestiere/Ardon, personal communication, 2002). The pest is not present on 'alert lists' of phytosanitary organizations.
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Arthropoda
- Subphylum: Uniramia
- Class: Insecta
- Order: Hemiptera
- Suborder: Sternorrhyncha
- Superfamily: Aphidoidea
- Genus: Phloeomyzus
- Species: Phloeomyzus passerinii
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page
Ph. passerinii was described as Schizoneura passerinii by Signoret (1875); it was later attributed to the genus Löwia (Lichtenstein, 1885) and finally to the genus Phloeomyzus by Horváth (1896). Originally included in the large family Aphididae (Hemiptera, Homoptera), it was subsequently moved to the family Thelaxidae and then to the Phloeomyzidae. Phloeomyzus dubius, Phloeomyzus redelei and Phloeomyzus dearborni are considered synonyms of Ph. passerinii (Eastop and Hille Ris Lambers, 1976; Masutti, 1982).
DescriptionTop of page
Apterous virginoparous female: pale yellowish-green to dull-white, slightly mealy, with dusky legs and lateral tufts of white or bluish-white woolly and waxy matter on each side toward the apex. Head dusky. Antennae of five segments (sometimes six due to the subdivision of the third one), brown or smoky, pale between the segments, very short, hardly reaching the first pair of legs. Rostrum acuminate and very long, reaching the metacoxae. Eyes very small, black. Legs short, scarcely projecting beyond the body, thick. Anal plate and cauda rounded; three rather large blunt projections on either side of body. Two wax plates each side in front of cauda. Cornicles inconspicuous. Body oval. Total body length 1.6-1.7 mm.
First-instar larva: yellowish-green with dusky antennae, legs and tip of rostrum. Oval-elongated body shape, with parallel sides. Length 0.5 mm. Antennae of four articles. Rostrum thick and very long, exceeding body length. Legs thick and long.
Second-instar larva: in comparison with the first-instar larva, legs and antennae more slender, rostrum shorter, with the tip hardly reaching the apex of the abdomen. Body darker and more oval in shape. Length 0.7 mm.
Third- and fourth-instar larvae: very similar to the second-instar larva, with body more oval in shape. Length 1.10 and 1.30 mm, respectively.
Third- and fourth-instar nymphs: yellowish-green in the third-instar, darker in the fourth-instar, with dusky eyes, legs and rostrum tip. Oval elongated in shape. Antennae with five articles in the third-instar and six articles in the fourth-instar. Wing pads very small in the third-instar and well developed in the fourth-instar. Length 1.1 and 1.4 mm, respectively.
Alate oviparous female: green with dark head and thorax. Dusky antennae and legs. Antennae slender, nearly as long as head and thorax, with six articles and without secondary sensoria. Rostrum long and slender, reaching the metacoxae. Legs slender, with thick femora and long tibiae. Eyes large. Wing veins clouded on each side with brown. Cauda rounded. Generally two eggs in each individual. Length 1.5 mm.
Alate male: smaller than female (length about 1 mm). Antennae with six articles.
Egg: subcylindrical, three times longer than wide. Reddish-orange, shiny. Length 0.3-0.4 mm (Theobald, 1929; Arzone and Vidano, 1984).
DistributionTop of page
Ph. passerinii has a euro-asiatic distribution. Its native range stretches from European (Italy, Spain, Greece, France, Hungary, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Great Britain, Russia) and Middle-Eastern countries (Israel, Syria, Iran, Egypt) to Pakistan and China, where a new subspecies has been recorded (Zhang and Zhong, 1982). If Phloeomyzus dearborni is considered a synonym of Ph. passerinii, the pest is now also present in the USA and Canada (Smith, 1974), where it was probably introduced. Further studies are needed in order to define the real taxonomic status of the different populations.
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Country||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||References||Notes|
|-Hebei||Present||Native||Not invasive||Zhang & Zhong, 1982|
|-Liaoning||Present||Native||Not invasive||Zhang & Zhong, 1982|
|-Shandong||Present||Native||Not invasive||Zhang & Zhong, 1982|
|Israel||Present||Native||Not invasive||Halperin, 1981|
|Pakistan||Present||Native||Not invasive||Habib & Ghani, 1970|
|Syria||Widespread||Native||Invasive||Nef & Menu, 1994|
|Egypt||Present||Native||Not invasive||Hall, 1928|
|Canada||Present||Introduced||Not invasive||Smith, 1974|
|-Maine||Present||Introduced||Not invasive||Smith, 1974|
|Belgium||Present||Native||Not invasive||Nef & Menu, 1994|
|France||Present||Native||Invasive||Maugard & Chauvel, 1997|
|Germany||Present||Native||Not invasive||Della Beffa, 1936|
|Greece||Present||Native||Not invasive||Garuphalos & Tsitsones, 1965|
|Hungary||Present||Native||Not invasive||Nef & Menu, 1994|
|Italy||Widespread||Native||Invasive||Della Beffa, 1936|
|Netherlands||Present||Native||Not invasive||Doom & Hille Ris Lambers, 1962|
|Russian Federation||Present||Native||Not invasive||Cholodkovsky, 1921|
|Spain||Present||Native||Not invasive||Aparisi, 1971|
|UK||Present||Native||Not invasive||Theobald, 1929|
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page
P. passerinii was probably introduced in North America from Europe and Asia (where it was described as Phloeomyzus dearborni), and now it is recorded in Maine (USA) and Canada.
HabitatTop of page
P. passerinii is generally present at low population levels on Populus species growing in the natural riparian woodlands of the Mediterranean area. Its virulence is highly enhanced by cultural conditions, mainly due to a great reduction of genetic variability of trees (plantations are usually monoclonal) and to a high plant density (more than 300 plants per hectare). Therefore, P. passerinii can be considered as a typical 'cultural pest' (Allegro and Cagelli, 1996).
Habitat ListTop of page
|Coastal areas||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Cultivated / agricultural land||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Disturbed areas||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Managed forests, plantations and orchards||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Managed grasslands (grazing systems)||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Protected agriculture (e.g. glasshouse production)||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Rail / roadsides||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Urban / peri-urban areas||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Natural forests||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Natural grasslands||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Riverbanks||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Wetlands||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
Hosts/Species AffectedTop of page
As far as we know, P. passerinii feeds exclusively on Populus species. Populus nigra and Populus canadensis (hybrids between P. nigra and Populus deltoides) are its preferred hosts, but P. deltoides can also be affected, even though its susceptibility to the pest is generally lower (Lapietra and Allegro, 1990). Populus ciliata was recorded as a potential host in Pakistan (Habib and Ghani, 1970), and Chodjai and Loftian (1988) showed its susceptibility in laboratory tests. The pest was also recorded on Populus alba (Theobald, 1929; Della Beffa, 1936). If Phloeomyzus dearborni is considered a synonym of P. passerinii, Populus tremuloides can also be affected in North America (Smith, 1974).
SymptomsTop of page
In old poplar stands, P. passerinii generally starts developing in crevices of the bark, often at the insertion of the lowest branches on the trunk, 5-6 m above the ground. North-facing parts of a trunk are more likely to be infested at the beginning of outbreaks. Aphid colonies are revealed by the abundant woolly and whitish waxy flocks, which are produced in abundance mainly by apterous females. When heavy infestations develop, the colonies and their waxy exudates can cover the whole trunk. Feeding activity, which involves the injection of a toxic saliva, causes bark suberization and, during the heaviest attacks, cracks and necroses. Death of the bark causes disruption of water and nutrient circulation, determining a progressive stress for the roots. In some cases, the tree can collapse during the summer or can be broken by the wind (Lapietra and Allegro, 1981).
Symptoms ListTop of page
|plant dead; dieback|
|plant dead; dieback|
Biology and EcologyTop of page Genetics
Nothing is known about the genetic variability of P. passerinii populations within their natural range. Different ecotypes are likely to be present, as environmental conditions vary consistently between Mediterranean and northern European areas. Moreover, populations physiologically adapted to different Populus species could have evolved. Morphological, physiological and molecular studies could also give new perspectives for a taxonomic revision of the genus. The development of local aphid lineages, owing to the selective pressure of cultivated poplar clones, has not been scientifically demonstrated until now (Lapietra, 1983). Physiology and Phenology
Nothing is known about the feeding physiology of Ph. passerinii, which is likely to occur on the parenchymal tissues of the bark, rich in carbohydrates and nitrogen compounds (Allegro, 1997). This is true, as demonstrated by Pollard (1973), for many genera belonging to the Adelgidae, Pemphigidae and Phylloxeridae families, which are strictly related to the Phloeomyzidae. A morphological study was carried out on the digestive system of Ph. passerinii (Ponsen, 1982), without investigating the physiology of digestion. The colonies start developing from May to June, when temperatures become favourable, and disappear at the latest from August to September, even if overwintering can be anticipated in the case of adverse climatic conditions such as early cold weather or violent storms. Heavy infestations generally occur sporadically and in the poplar plantations of the Po Valley (northern Italy) these have been recorded at intervals of 5 to 10 years, but favourable climatic trends can determine more frequent events (Allegro, 1997). Reproductive Biology
Ph. passerinii is usually anholocyclic on poplar through populations of apterous virginoparous females. Over 12 generations per year can be observed in the field, depending on the climate. Each generation lasts 9 to 31 days (on average 11 days), in relation to air temperature and conditions of the host. In the laboratory, there can be 30 or more generations per year. Each female can generate about 170 larvae over an average life span of 36 days. Overwintering occurs in the second or third larval instar (rarely in the fourth-instar), generally in the crevices of the bark of superficial roots. The first-instar larva is the only form able to diffuse the infestation both actively, by reaching a new position on the plant, and passively, by being wind-dispersed together with the waxy flocks. Once the larva has reached its new position and has inserted the stylet into the bark tissues, it develops into the adult stage without moving; also the adult females generally do not move from their original position (Arzone and Vidano, 1984). The winged forms, males and oviparous females, are frequently observed in laboratory-reared populations when the host plants or cuttings start deteriorating. In the field they have only been occasionally observed and mainly in the autumn period. The winged forms probably do not feed (Arzone and Vidano, 1984; Allegro, 1997). Egg laying has never been observed in wild populations, and a heterotopous cycle with a secondary host has never been demonstrated. Most of the biological observations (as well as those on host resistance behaviour) were carried out on laboratory-reared individuals. They were based on artificial inoculations of poplar cuttings kept in jars with water at the bottom, at a constant temperature of 20°C and a relative humidity of 70% (Arru, 1971; Arru, 1974; Lapietra and Allegro, 1990; Allegro et al., 1996). Environmental Requirements
Moderately high air temperatures (20-25°C), high air humidity (more than 70% RH), limited air movement and scarce sun radiation are favourable for Ph. passerinii. These are the reasons that make dense and old poplar stands, especially if growing in humid riparian areas, very favourable to pest development (Lapietra and Allegro, 1981; Arzone and Vidano, 1984; Allegro, 1997).
Notes on Natural EnemiesTop of page
Refer to Vidotti (1960), Arzone (1987) and Raspi (1996) for natural enemy predators of P. passerinii.
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page Natural Dispersal
P. passerinii shows very scarce capacity of active movements and dispersal, as only the first-instar larvae move on the tree looking for new positions and only for a short time before inserting their stylets in the bark tissues. First-instar larvae can be easily transported by the wind at considerable distances, together with the waxy exudates of the colonies. The distribution of the colonies inside monoclonal poplar stands is unpredictable, as non-infested trees can grow beside heavily infested ones. Silvicultural Practices
Dense plantations are favourable for P. passerinii, as it prefers shadow, high relative humidity and scarce air movement. Heavy infestations can start in such favourable habitats and propagate to surrounding plantations. Movement in Trade
Passive transport by freshly felled poplar trunks, if not debarked, is very likely. Quarantine international rules generally forbid the import/export of trunks with bark.
Plant TradeTop of page
|Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport||Pest stages||Borne internally||Borne externally||Visibility of pest or symptoms|
|Roots||larvae||No||Yes||Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye|
|Stems (above ground), Shoots, Trunks, Branches||adults; larvae||No||Yes||Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye|
|Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport|
|Bulbs, Tubers, Corms, Rhizomes|
|Flowers, Inflorescences, Cones, Calyx|
|Fruits (inc. pods)|
|Growing medium accompanying plants|
|Seedlings, Micropropagated plants|
|True seeds (inc. grain)|
Wood PackagingTop of page
|Wood Packaging not known to carry the pest in trade/transport|
|Loose wood packing material|
|Processed or treated wood|
|Solid wood packing material with bark|
|Solid wood packing material without bark|
Impact SummaryTop of page
ImpactTop of page
P. passerinii is considered an economically important pest of cultivated poplars in Italy, Syria, Belgium and Hungary (Nef and Menu, 1994), but there is evidence of its increasing virulence in other countries such as France (Maugard and Chauvel, 1997) and Spain (Aparisi, 1971). Periodically (at intervals of 5-10 years), P. passerinii is very harmful to poplar plantations in northern Italy, where the majority of cultivated clones (about 80% of the trees) are susceptible to attacks (Arru, 1975).
Environmental ImpactTop of page
As P. passerinii develops outbreaks almost exclusively in cultured conditions, its impact on natural riparian poplar populations is negligible.
Detection and InspectionTop of page
Inspect the bark of freshly felled poplar trunks (if not previously treated with heat or fumigants) especially at crevices and lenticels, looking for the whitish woolly exudates of the aphids. Storage of trunks in a humid room (70-90% RH) for a few days stimulates the development of colonies, making them visible.
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page
Similar behaviour and symptoms are shown by the pemphigid Eriosoma lanigerum, which is anholocyclic monoecious on Malus sp.
Prevention and ControlTop of page Phytosanitary Measures
P. passerinii occurs in almost all of the Palaearctic area where poplar is cultivated. It is not a quarantine pest, but particular attention should be paid to avoid its introduction into countries of the Southern Hemisphere where poplar cultivation could rise to economic importance. For this reason the import of freshly felled poplar trunks with bark should be strictly forbidden in these countries. Cultural Control and Sanitary Methods
Complete or satisfactory practical control of the pest can be achieved by growing resistant or moderately resistant poplar clones. The probability of heavy infestations and economical damage can be significantly decreased by widely spacing plants in a stand (more than 6 x 6 m). Host-Plant Resistance
The resistance behaviour to P. passerinii among the different Populus species and cultivated clones may vary consistently and is genetically modified (Arru, 1967). For this reason, the breeding of poplars for the character of resistance may lead to appreciable results in a reasonably short time (Arru and Lapietra, 1979). A laboratory test based on the artificial inoculation of poplar cuttings (Arru, 1971; Arru, 1974) proved to be very useful; early evaluations of the resistance behaviour of populations belonging to the parental species Populus deltoides (Arru and Lapietra, 1979) and Populus nigra (Allegro and Cagelli, 1996) were obtained. These are bred in order to obtain hybrid clones of cultural interest. P. nigra genotypes showed a wide range of resistance levels from very scarce to very high, with a higher ratio of resistant genotypes among those from southern Italy. In contrast, generally P. deltoides exhibited high resistance levels. The laboratory test was validated by comparing the results obtained in controlled conditions with field behaviour displayed by the same clones during natural infestations of the pest (Lapietra and Allegro, 1986). A corrected methodology in the laboratory test was proposed following the evidence that clones generally display a constant resistance level in time but some of them vary their behaviour according to the season (Allegro et al., 1996). Poplar selection programmes in Italy currently adopt this test in order to obtain early information on the clonal resistance behaviour to P. passerinii. The newly selected hybrid clones range from highly resistant to highly susceptible (Lapietra and Allegro, 1986; Lapietra and Allegro, 1990; Allegro et al., 1996). Iranian poplar species and cultivars were also tested by field and laboratory methods (Chodjai and Loftian, 1988; Chodjai and Loftian, 1990; Shojai et al., 1998; Sadeghi et al., 2002). A study on the biochemical markers of resistance, based on the analysis of phenolic compounds in three groups of P. nigra, each characterized by a different resistance behaviour, showed that phenolics discriminate resistance groups. In particular, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzoic acid were statistically relevant in separating the groups; so they are likely to play a role in the resistance mechanism (Allegro et al., 1995). Biological Control
P. passerinii colonies were sprayed with a suspension of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae under laboratory conditions and no significant mortality was observed (G Allegro, Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura, Italy, personal communication, 2004). At endemic levels, the natural enemy populations were always ineffective at preventing natural outbreaks of P. passerinii, due to its high reproductive rate under favourable conditions, even if they probably play a significant role in the decline of outbreaks. Chemical Control
Chemical control is generally needed when outbreaks occur in poplar plantations. Trunk sprays with white mineral oils alone or mixed with organophosphates always proved to be effective, when carried out at the beginning of the outbreaks (Aparisi, 1971; Lapietra and Allegro, 1981; Allegro, 1989; Allegro, 1997; Giorcelli and Allegro, 1999). The use of pyrethroids is not recommended as they can be very harmful to populations of useful arthropods living in the poplar stands (G Allegro, Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura, Italy, personal communication, 2004). In the same way, preventive sprays are not recommended due to environmental considerations (Allegro, 1997). Trunk injection with systemic insecticides was proposed in Israel against a number of leaf and trunk pests (Halperin, 1981). Field Monitoring/Economic Threshold Levels
Monitoring older (over 5 years old) poplar plantations made of susceptible clones during the risk period (May to August) is fundamental in order to detect outbreaks early and to plan a rational control strategy. As a rule, the intervention threshold is reached when colonies start spreading out of the bark crevices and covering large areas of the trunk. When colonies cover the whole trunk circumference, a delay of about 2 weeks in applying control methods can be enough to cause serious damage to the tree. IPM Programmes
In order to set up effective and environmentally safe control strategies, an information model for a reasoned phytosanitary protection of poplar was assessed in Italy (Montermini et al., 1998).
ReferencesTop of page
Allegro G, 1989. Defence against insect pests of poplar: a revised technique. Informatore Agrario, 45(16):93-96
Allegro G, 1997. Nuove infestazioni di Afide lanigero del pioppo (Phloeomyzus passerinii Sign.) in Pianura Padana. Sherwood - Foreste ed alberi oggi, 27:41-45.
Allegro G, Augustin S, Delplanque A, Giorcelli A, Steenackers M, Pinon J, 1995. Inter-disciplinary research for poplar improvement (Task 2 ‘Genetics of resistance and virulence: molecular, biochemical and conventional approaches’. Sub-Task 2.3 ‘Biochemical markers’). AIR1-CT92-0349, Final Technical Report, 79-110.
Allegro G, Cagelli L, 1996. Susceptibility of Populus nigra L. to the woolly poplar aphid (Phloeomyzus passerinii Sign.). Forest Genetics, 3(1):23-26; 8 ref.
Allegro G, Picco F, Bianco B, 1996. Resistance behaviour to Phloeomyzus passerinii of some recently-selected Italian poplar clones. Proceedings of 20th Session, Budapest, Hungary: FAO/IPC, 1:199-208.
Aparisi C, 1971. Note on the poplar woolly aphid Phloeomyzus passerinii Signoret, and tests on its treatment. Boletin del Servicio de Plagas Forestales, 14(27):3-11
Arru GM, 1967. Resistance to insects in Poplars grown in Italy. Proc. 14th Congr. Int. Union For. Res. Organ., Munich Pt. III, Sect. 22, (861-6). [11 refs.].
Arru GM, 1971. A method for the evaluation of the resistance of poplars to Phloeomyzus passerinii Sign. FAO/CIP/71/24 (Bucarest 27/IX-2/II/71).
Arru GM, 1974. Metodo per valutare la resistenza dei pioppi all’Afide lanigero (Phloeomyzus passerinii Sign.). Cellulosa e Carta, 25(5):45-49.
Arru GM, 1975. Annotated list of the most important insects injurious to the cultivation of poplar in Italy. Cellulosa e Carta, 26(11):47-50
Arru GM, Lapietra G, 1979. Breeding poplars for resistance to insect pests. Proc. Meeting Cons. Poplars in France and Belgium (Orleans e Geraardsbergen).
Arzone A, 1987. Contributo alla conoscenza dei limitatori di Phloeomyzus passerinii (Sign.). Ann. Acc. Agric. Torino, 129:139-158.
Arzone A, Vidano C, 1984. Investigations on Phloeomyzus passerinii (Sign.) in Piedmont. Annali della Facolta di Scienze Agrarie della Universita degli Studi di Torino, 13:337-356
Chodjai M, 1977. Poplar pests of Iran and the Mideast. In: Thielges BA, Land SB Jr, ed. Proceedings: symposium on eastern cottonwood and related species. Greenville, Mississippi Sept. 28 - Oct. 2, 1976. Louisiana State University Division of Continuing Education. Baton Rouge USA, 295-300
Chodjai M, Loftian H, 1988. Resistance of Iranian poplar clones to woolly Aphid Phloeomyzus passerinii Sign., Homoptera, Aphididae. 18th Session I.P.C., Beijing (China).
Chodjai M, Loftian H, 1990. Studies about the resistance of poplar species, cultivars and clones to Phloeomyzus passerinii Sign. (Hom. Aphididae). Proc. FAO/IPC (Buenos Aires), FO:CIP:I/90/6:47-68.
Cholodkovsky NA, 1921. [Note on the Poplar Aphid, Schizoneura passerinii.] Bull. Sub-Section Control Plant Pests attached to the Petrograd Committe of Rural Economy, 2:3-6 (in Russian).
Della Beffa G, 1936. Contributo alla conoscenza degli insetti parassiti dei pioppi. Il Phloeomyzus passerinii Sign. (Afide lanigero dei pioppi). Boll. Lab. Sperim. R. Oss. Fitop. Torino, 18(3-4):17-23.
Doom D, Hille Ris Lambers D, 1962. Over het massaal voorkommen von de schimelluis Phloeomyzus redelei H.R.L. op populieren in 1961 in Nederland. Nederlands Bosbouwtijdschrift, 34(6):202-208.
Eastop VF, Hille Ris Lambers D, 1976. Survey of the World's Aphids. The Hague, Netherlands: DR. W. Junk bv Publishers.
Garuphalos I, Tsitsones K, 1965. Phloeomyzus [Phloeosinus] passerinii in Poplar plantations in N. Greece. Das. Chron., 7(10):420-248.
Giorcelli A, Allegro G, 1999. I trattamenti per una corretta difesa fitosanitaria del pioppeto. Sherwood - Foreste Ed Alberi Oggi, 45:39-44.
Habib R, Ghani MA, 1970. Eriosomatinae on poplars and their natural enemies in West Pakistan. Technical Bulletin, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, 13:43-58
Hall WJ, 1928. Notes on the Aphididae of Egypt. Bulletin, Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt, 68.
Halperin J, 1981. Use of trunk injections for pest control on ornamental trees in Israel. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie, 3(1/3):294-297
Horváth H, 1896. Wien. Entomologische Zeitschrift, 15(5).
Lapietra B, Allegro G, 1990. Susceptibility to Phloeomyzus passerinii Sign. of poplar clones cultivated in Italy. Informatore Fitopatologico, 40(11):41-44
Lapietra G, 1983. Sull’Afide lanigero del pioppo. Economia Montana, 2:54-55.
Lapietra G, Allegro G, 1981. La difesa del pioppeto: cenni sulla biologia e sui metodi di controllo degli insetti più dannosi. L’Informatore Agrario, 37(34):16995-16998.
Lapietra G, Allegro G, 1986. Susceptibility to Phloeomyzus passerinii Sign. of poplar clones selected in Italy. Proc. XI Sess. FAO/IPC/Working Party on Insects and Other Animal Pests (Louvain-la-Neuve), FO:CIP:I/86/6:165-177.
Lapietra G, Allegro G, 1990. Insects damaging poplars in Italy during 1987-89, control strategies and future perspectives. Proceedings - Working Party on Insects and Other Animal Pests, FAO International Poplar Commission Rome, Italy; Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 35:31-36
Lichtenstein J, 1885. Les Pucerons. Monographie des aphidiens. I. Genera. Montpellier, 6.
Masutti L, 1982. The insects of Euroamerican poplars and their original food-plants. Ecological aspects of problems of prevention and control. Arboricoltura da Legno, 25(5):8 pp.
Maugard F, Chauvel G, 1997. Impact of a severe woolly poplar aphid (Phloeomyzus passerinii) outbreak. International conference on pests in agriculture, 6-8 January 1997, at le Corum, Montpellier, France. Volume 3., 919-926; 10 ref.
Montermini A, Vai N, Barani A, Nanni C, Boselli M, Scaravelli P, Marchetti L, Pacchiarini L, Oliva G, Vezzadini S, 1998. Assessment of an information model for the reasoned phytosanitary protection of the poplar. Atti, Giornate fitopatologiche, Scicli e Ragusa, 3-7 maggio, 1998, 709-714; 2 ref.
Nef L, Menu JF, 1994. Internationally important damaging poplar insects. Results of an inquiry among the members of the International Poplar Commission. Proc. Meeting FAO/IPC Izmit, Turkey.
Pollard DG, 1973. Plant penetration by feeding aphids (Hemiptera, Aphidoidea): a review. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 62(4):631-714
Ponsen MB, 1982. The digestive system of Phloeomyzus passerinii (Signoret) (Homoptera: Aphidoidea). Mededelingen, Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen, 10:1-6.
Raspi A, 1996. Thaumatomyia elongatula (Becker) (Chloropidae) and Leucopis annulipes Zetterstedt (Chamaemyiidae): two Diptera preying on Phloeomyzus passerinii (Signoret) (Homoptera: Phloeomyzidae) in Italy. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 98(3):509-516; 27 ref.
Sadeghi SE, Rajabi-Mazhar NA, Moharramipour S, 2007. A study on the incidence of woolly poplar aphid, Phloemyzus passerinii (Hom.: Aphididae) on poplar species and clones in Hamedan province, Iran. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran, 26(2):47-59.
Sadeghi SE, Tarasi J, Askary H, 2002. Resistance and susceptibility of eleven poplar clones to poplar wooly aphid; Phloeomyzus passerinii Signoiret in Zanjan province of Iran. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology, 69(2):Pe57-Pe67, en11-en13; 18 ref.
Shojai M, Lotfian H, Nasrollahi A, Yassini A, Azma M, Gasmi R, 1998. Bioecology of poplar wooly aphid Phloeomyzus passerini Sing. (Hom.: Aphididae) and its host resistance conditions in Poplar Plantations of Iran. Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Islamic Azad University, 4(13/14):21-49, 83-85; 18 ref.
Signoret V, 1875. Schizoneura passerinii. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, 5:102-104.
Smith CF, 1974. The genus Phloeomyzus with the description of P. dearborni n. sp. from Populus tremuloides Michx. (Homoptera: Aphididae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 76(1):66-72
Theobald FV, 1929. Genus Phloeomyzus Horváth. The plant lice or Aphididae of Great Britain, 3:268-272.
Vidotti G, 1960. Osservazioni sull’etologia ed ecologia del Phloeomyzus passerinii Sign. nella zona di Este (Hemiptera Aphididae Aphidinae). Atti del Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, 118:203-218.
Zhang GX, Zhong TS, 1982. New species and subspecies of Chinese Aphidoidea. Sinozoologica, No. 2:19-28
Top of page
- = Present, no further details
- = Evidence of pathogen
- = Widespread
- = Last reported
- = Localised
- = Presence unconfirmed
- = Confined and subject to quarantine
- = See regional map for distribution within the country
- = Occasional or few reports