Datasheet
Centella asiatica (Asiatic pennywort)
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate report
Pictures
Top of page| Picture | Title | Caption | Copyright |  | Title | Habit |
|---|
| Caption | Centella asiatica (Asiatic pennywort); habit, showing leaves and flowers. Thot, Can Tho, Vietnam. December, 2013. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©Bùi Thụy Đào Nguyên/via wikipedia - CC BY-SA 3.0 |
|---|
 |
| Habit | Centella asiatica (Asiatic pennywort); habit, showing leaves and flowers. Thot, Can Tho, Vietnam. December, 2013. | ©Bùi Thụy Đào Nguyên/via wikipedia - CC BY-SA 3.0 |
 | Title | Habit |
|---|
| Caption | Centella asiatica (Asiatic pennywort); habit. USA. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©John D. Byrd/Mississippi State University/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US |
|---|
 |
| Habit | Centella asiatica (Asiatic pennywort); habit. USA. | ©John D. Byrd/Mississippi State University/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US |
 | Title | Infestation |
|---|
| Caption | Centella asiatica (Asiatic pennywort); infestation, showing leaves. Waikapu Valley, Maui, Hawaii, USA. February, 2012. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©Forest & Kim Starr-2012 - CC BY 3.0 |
|---|
 |
| Infestation | Centella asiatica (Asiatic pennywort); infestation, showing leaves. Waikapu Valley, Maui, Hawaii, USA. February, 2012. | ©Forest & Kim Starr-2012 - CC BY 3.0 |
 | Title | Leaf |
|---|
| Caption | Centella asiatica (Asiatic pennywort); close-up of leaf. Wahinepee, Maui, Hawaii, USA. August, 2002. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©Forest & Kim Starr-2002 - CC BY 3.0 |
|---|
 |
| Leaf | Centella asiatica (Asiatic pennywort); close-up of leaf. Wahinepee, Maui, Hawaii, USA. August, 2002. | ©Forest & Kim Starr-2002 - CC BY 3.0 |
 | Title | Leaf |
|---|
| Caption | Centella asiatica (Asiatic pennywort); infestation, close-up of leaf in habitat. West Maui, Maui, Hawaii, USA. February, 2009. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©Forest & Kim Starr-2009 - CC BY 3.0 |
|---|
 |
| Leaf | Centella asiatica (Asiatic pennywort); infestation, close-up of leaf in habitat. West Maui, Maui, Hawaii, USA. February, 2009. | ©Forest & Kim Starr-2009 - CC BY 3.0 |
Identity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Centella asiatica (L.) Urb.
Preferred Common Name
Other Scientific Names
- Centella boninensis Nakai ex Tuyama
- Centella coriacea Nannf.
- Centella erecta (L. f.) Fernald
- Centella glochidiata (Benth.) Drude
- Centella hirtella Nannf.
- Centella repanda (Pers.) Small
- Centella tussilaginifolia (Baker) Domin
- Centella ulugurensis (Engl.) Domin
- Centella uniflora (Colenso) Nannf.
- Chondrocarpus asiaticus Nutt.
- Chondrocarpus triflorus Nutt.
- Glyceria asiatica Nutt.
- Glyceria triflora Nutt.
- Hydrocotyle asiatica L.
- Hydrocotyle biflora P. Vell.
- Hydrocotyle brasiliensis Scheidw. ex Otto & F. Dietr.
- Hydrocotyle brevipedata St. Lager & St.-Lag
- Hydrocotyle ficarifolia Stokes
- Hydrocotyle ficarioides Lam.
- Hydrocotyle inaequipes DC.
- Hydrocotyle lurida Hance
- Hydrocotyle nummularioides A. Rich
- Hydrocotyle reniformis Walte
- Hydrocotyle repanda Pers.
- Hydrocotyle sylvicola E. Jacob Cordemoy
- Hydrocotyle triflora Ruiz & Pav
- Hydrocotyle tussilaginifolia Baker
- Hydrocotyle uniflora Colenso
International Common Names
- English: centella; goyu cola; goyu kola; Indian pennywort; marsh pennywort; pennyweed; sheeprot; spadeleaf
- Spanish: hierba de clavo; sombrerito
- French: écuelle d’eau; fausse violette; hydroctyle asiatique
- Chinese: ji xue cao
Local Common Names
- Bangladesh: pahartali
- Cook Islands: kapukapu
- Cuba: oreja de raton
- Fiji: tatandra; tododro; totono
- Germany: Asiatische Sumpfpfennigkraut
- Hawaii: pohe kula
- India: brahmi
- Japan: tsubokusa; tsubo-kusa
- Sweden: sallatsspikblad
- Thailand: buabok
- USA: coinwort
- West Bengal: thankuni
EPPO code
- CLLAS (Centella asiatica)
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of page
C. asiatica is a low-growing perennial with a pan-tropical distribution. It can spread to form a dense ground cover, desirable in some situations but unwelcome in others. It is recorded as invasive in a number of Pacific islands to which it has been introduced and is classed as High Risk (score 7) by PIER (2014), but the situations in which it is causing problems are not clear. It is not especially competitive in crops but may affect wild vegetation and biodiversity. C. asiatica is also among a number of species invasive in the Dongting Lake wetlands, Hunan province, China (Hou et al., 2011).
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Dicotyledonae
- Order: Apiales
- Family: Apiaceae
- Genus: Centella
- Species: Centella asiatica
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of page
C. asiatica has been known by a wide range of synonyms but only Hydrocotyle asiatica is still occasionally used. Both genera have sometimes been referred to the family Hydrocotylaceae but are now included in Apiaceae (= Umbelliferae).
Floridata (2014) suggested that material previously known as C. asiatica in USA is in fact a separate species C. erecta (= C. repanda). This is based on the paper by Fernald (1940), who established this name. US sources currently make the distinction, listing C. erecta as native in a number of states, and C. asiatica as introduced in Florida and Oregon only. As there is still some doubt and disagreement concerning this possible split, and as it has not been possible to trace any key describing the differences, for the purposes of this datasheet C. erecta is treated as a synonym of C. asiatica.
C. asiatica is a highly variable species and there has been much selection of types for medicinal and other uses. Some are registered as commercial varieties, such as cultivars Kayakirti and Majjaposhak in India (Mathur et al., 1999).
Description
Top of page
Adapted from Flora Zambesiaca (2014):
Perennial creeping herb, rooting at the nodes, but sometimes forming a large taproot. Stem terete, with shallow grooves, sometimes purplish. Leaves solitary or in groups of up to 5, pubescent or glabrous; lamina 1–7 cm. wide, reniform to almost orbicular, with a deep basal sinus; margin crenate, glabrous or with scattered hairs on upper part of petiole (petiole sometimes densely hairy when young). Umbels subcapitate; peduncles 1·5–5 cm. long, glabrous or pubescent, usually much shorter than the subtending petiole. Flowers 2–8, inconspicuous, hermaphrodite, with an involucre of 2 ovate, membranous, persistent bracts. Pedicels slender or obsolete; petals 5, dark crimson to greenish-white, 1 mm, orbicular with a slender inflexed point. Calyx teeth and stylopodium obsolete; styles short, ± divergent. Fruit 3·5 × 3 mm., orbicular to ellipsoid, brown at maturity, deeply constricted at the commissure and flattened laterally, primary ribs prominent when ripe, secondary ribs ± evident; carpophore entire, splitting in two at maturity with a seed in each half.
Plant Type
Top of pageBroadleaved
Herbaceous
Perennial
Seed propagated
Vegetatively propagated
Distribution
Top of page
According to USDA-ARS (2014), C. asiatica is native across much of tropical Africa, Asia, Australia, South America and some islands in the Pacific. Other sources including PIER (2014) indicate that it originates from Asia but is now pan-tropical.
C. asiatica has more recently been introduced to further islands in the Pacific and Indian Oceans and some temperate countries of Europe and western Asia. There are a number of Pacific islands where it is known to occur but there is no certainty whether it is native or introduced.
C. asiatica is listed as introduced to Florida and Texas in USA (USDA-NRCS, 2014) but there is confusion with the native C. erecta, which is here treated as a synonym (see Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature). Hence all USA records are treated here as native.
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
| Country | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | References | Notes | ASIA |
| Armenia | Present | | Introduced | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Azerbaijan | Present | | Introduced | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Bangladesh | Present | | Native | | | Islam et al., 2013 | |
| Bhutan | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Cambodia | Present only in captivity/cultivation | | Introduced | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Chagos Archipelago | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | PIER, 2014 | |
| China | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Anhui | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Fujian | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Guangdong | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Guangxi | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Hubei | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Hunan | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Jiangsu | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Jiangxi | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Shaanxi | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Sichuan | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Yunnan | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Zhejiang | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Christmas Island (Indian Ocean) | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Georgia (Republic of) | Present | | Introduced | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| India | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Sikkim | Present | | Native | | | Watson, 1999 | |
| -West Bengal | Present | | Native | | | Grierson & Long, 1999 | |
| Indonesia | Present | | Native | | | PIER, 2014 | |
| Iran | Present | | Native | | | WHO, 1999 | |
| Japan | Present | | Native | | | PIER, 2014; USDA-ARS, 2014 | Ogasawara islands |
| Korea, DPR | Present | | Native | | | PIER, 2014 | |
| Korea, Republic of | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Laos | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Malaysia | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Mongolia | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Myanmar | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Nepal | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Pakistan | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Philippines | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Saudi Arabia | Present | | Native | | | EOL, 2014 | |
| Singapore | Present | | Native | | | PIER, 2014 | |
| Sri Lanka | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Taiwan | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Thailand | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Vietnam | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Yemen | Present | | Native | | | EOL, 2014; GBIF, 2014 | |
AFRICA |
| Angola | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Benin | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Botswana | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Burkina Faso | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Burundi | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Cameroon | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Comoros | Present | | | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Côte d'Ivoire | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Equatorial Guinea | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Ethiopia | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Gabon | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Ghana | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Guinea | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Guinea-Bissau | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Kenya | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Lesotho | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Liberia | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Madagascar | Present | | Introduced | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Malawi | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Mali | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Mauritius | Present | | | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Mayotte | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Mozambique | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Namibia | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Niger | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Nigeria | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Réunion | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Saint Helena | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Senegal | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Seychelles | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | PIER, 2014; USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Sierra Leone | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Somalia | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| South Africa | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Swaziland | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Tanzania | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Togo | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Uganda | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Zambia | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Zimbabwe | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
NORTH AMERICA |
| Mexico | Present | | | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| USA | | | | | | | |
| -Alabama | Present | | Native | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | As C. erecta |
| -Arkansas | Present | | Native | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | As C. erecta |
| -Delaware | Present | | Native | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | As C. erecta |
| -Florida | Present | | | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | As C. erecta and C. asiatica |
| -Georgia | Present | | | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | |
| -Hawaii | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | PIER, 2014; USDA-ARS, 2014 | Hawai’I, Kaua’I, Lana’Ii, Maui, Moloka’I and O’ahu islands |
| -Louisiana | Present | | Native | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | As C. erecta |
| -Maryland | Present | | Native | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | As C. erecta |
| -Mississippi | Present | | Native | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | As C. erecta |
| -New Jersey | Present | | Native | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | As C. erecta |
| -North Carolina | Present | | Native | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | As C. erecta |
| -Oregon | Present | | | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | C. erecta and C. asiatica |
| -South Carolina | Present | | Native | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | As C. erecta |
| -Texas | Present | | Native | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | As C. erecta |
| -Virginia | Present | | Native | | | USDA-NRCS, 2014 | As C. erecta |
CENTRAL AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN |
| Bahamas | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Belize | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Cuba | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Dominica | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Dominican Republic | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| El Salvador | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Guatemala | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Jamaica | Present | | Native | | | Fernald, 1940 | |
| Puerto Rico | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Trinidad and Tobago | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
SOUTH AMERICA |
| Argentina | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Brazil | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Alagoas | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| -Bahia | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| -Espirito Santo | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| -Minas Gerais | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| -Parana | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| -Rio de Janeiro | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| -Rio Grande do Sul | Present | | Native | | | | |
| -Santa Catarina | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| -Sao Paulo | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Chile | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | And Juan Fernandez islands |
| Colombia | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Ecuador | Present | | Introduced | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | Galapagos Islands |
| Paraguay | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Peru | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Uruguay | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Venezuela | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
EUROPE |
| Liechtenstein | Present | | Introduced | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Norway | Present | | Introduced | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Russian Federation | Present | | | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
OCEANIA |
| American Samoa | Present | | Introduced | | | PIER, 2014 | Ofu, Olosega, Ta’u, Tutuila islands |
| Australia | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Lord Howe Is. | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | PIER, 2014 | |
| -New South Wales | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| -Queensland | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Cook Islands | Present | | | | | PIER, 2014 | Raratonga, Mangaia, Ma’uke, and Miti’aro islands |
| French Polynesia | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | PIER, 2014; USDA-ARS, 2014 | Fatu Hiva, Hiva Oa, Nuku Hiva, Maupiti, MooreaRaiatea, Tahiti, Raivavae, Rapa, Rimatara, Rurutu and Ua Huka islands |
| Guam | Present | | Native | | | PIER, 2014 | |
| Marshall Islands | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | PIER, 2014 | Ailinglaplap, Ebon,Jauit, Kwajalein, Namu, Ujae, Ailuk, Arno, Aur, Likiep, Majuro, Mejit, Mili, Utirik and Wotje islands |
| Micronesia, Federated states of | Present | | Native | | | PIER, 2014 | Etal, Lukunor, Namoluk, Pis, Puluwat, Satawan, Weno, KosraePohnpei, Fais, Faraulep, Ifalik, Ulithi, Woleai and Yap islands |
| New Caledonia | | | | | | PIER, 2014 | |
| New Zealand | Present | | Native | | | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Niue | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | GBIF, 2014 | |
| Norfolk Island | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | PIER, 2014 | |
| Northern Mariana Islands | Present | | Native | | | PIER, 2014; USDA-ARS, 2014 | Agrigan, lamagan,Anatahan, Pagan. Rota, Saipan, Sarigan islands |
| Palau | Present | | Native | | | PIER, 2014; USDA-ARS, 2014 | Tobi, Angaur, Babeldaob, Kayangel, Koror,Ngerkebesang, Merir, Pulo Ana, Sonsorol islands |
| Papua New Guinea | | | | | | PIER, 2014 | Bismark, Bouganville islands |
| Samoa | | | | | | PIER, 2014 | |
| Solomon Islands | Present | | Native | | | USDA-ARS, 2014 | |
| Tonga | | | | | | PIER, 2014 | Kao, Tonga, Eua, Tongatapu, Tafahi and Vava’u islands |
| Tuvalu | | | | | | PIER, 2014 | |
| Vanuatu | | | | | | PIER, 2014 | |
| Wallis and Futuna Islands | Present | | Introduced | | Invasive | PIER, 2014 | |
Risk of Introduction
Top of page
Considering its widespread use and popularity as a medicinal herb (see Uses), there are clear risks of its introduction to further territories for such use. Even in Hawaii, where it is noted as an invasive weed, it is available from a local plant nursery (Hawaiian Tropical Plant Nursery, 2014).
Habitat
Top of page
C. asiatica is a plant of relatively wet habitats, such as pastures, meadows, ditches, riversides, ponds, wetlands, wet forest, roadsides, in plantation crops and some annual crops including rice, from 300-1450 m altitude (PIER, 2014; IUCN, 2015). It is adapted to partial shade but also thrives in full sun.
Habitat List
Top of page| Category | Habitat | Presence | Status | | Terrestrial-managed |
| Cultivated / agricultural land | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
| Managed forests, plantations and orchards | Principal habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
| Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
| Rail / roadsides | Principal habitat | Natural |
| Terrestrial-natural/semi-natural |
| Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | |
| Riverbanks | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Natural |
| Wetlands | Principal habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
| Wetlands | Principal habitat | Natural |
Hosts/Species Affected
Top of page
C. asiatica is recorded as a weed in rice paddies, various plantation crops and forestry, but there are no indications of serious crop loss due to C. asiatica. Where it is listed as invasive, some native species are being impacted but little detail has been seen. In Hawaii, C. asiatica is among introduced species which have contributed to the decline of native sedges Carex thunbergii and Carex echinata (University of Hawaii, 1991).
Biology and Ecology
Top of page
Genetics
Reported chromosome numbers include 2n = 18, 36, 54 (Missouri Botanical Garden, 2014).
Rakotondralambo et al. (2013) confirmed the presence of both diploid and tetraploid populations in Madagascar and measured differences in triterpenoid levels. A deliberately induced tetraploid line has been shown to have greater dry weight, larger leaves and increased content of triterpenoids (Thong-on et al., 2014).
A number of studies have confirmed the considerable variation across different populations of C. asiatica, including in China (Zhang et al., 2012) and in India (Mathur et al., 2003).
In leaf transcriptome studies, results from gene ontology and functional annotation of sequences resulted in the identification of genes related to different sets of cellular functions, including identification of genes related to primary and secondary metabolism (Sangwan et al., 2013).
Reproductive Biology
C. asiatica reproduces by seed and by its far-reaching runners, which root at the nodes and can survive separation from the parent plant (Floridata, 2014). C. asiatica is pollinated by insects (PFAF, 2015).
Singh and Singh (2002) compared the growth rates of seedlings and individual ramets from established plants and concluded that the latter are the more important in maintaining and extending populations at the local level.
In relation to its value as a medicinal plant and concern at the possible loss of useful ecotypes, a number of authors (e.g. Hanumantharaya et al., 2010; Joshi et al., 2013) have reported methods for in vitro plantlet regeneration via callus-mediated organogenesis from leaf and stem explants. Gandi and Giri (2012) also reported the successful transformation of C. asiatica using Agrobacterium rhizogenes 8196.
Physiology and Phenology
Fresh seeds tend to be dormant for about two months but are then able to germinate at 25-30°C, with best germination in red or white light (Devkota and Jha, 2010a). Germination was seriously inhibited by salinity (NaCl at 6500 ppm) (Devkota and Jha, 2010a).
Nutrition
Under artificial shade net condition, 100:50:0 kg NPK/ha was found optimum for growth of C. asiatica (Krishnamurthy et al., 2006). In a pot study, Devkota and Jha (2013) compared different ratios of urea and farmyard manure and found the optimum to be a 50:50 mixture of the two.
Associations
An area of low-lying (5-3000 m altitude) grazed Zoysia japonica grassland in northwest Kyushu, Japan, was recognized as a new association of Zoysia japonica, characterized by the presence of C. asiatica and Lespedeza cuneata var. serpens (Itow, 1970).
Environmental Requirements
C. asiatica prefers damp habitats (IUCN, 2015). It can tolerate partial shade but also grows in full sun. Devkota and Jha (2010b) recorded highest biomass under 30% shading but found that root systems were strongest in full sunlight. Growth was reduced at 50 and 70% shading.
C. asiatica will grow on a wide range of soil types, including clay, but favours lighter soils with clay content below 50% (Devkota and Jha, 2014).
C. asiatica grown under the shade of a mango orchard produced dry yield of 5.52 tonnes/ha from six coppicings per hectare in two years. Under artificial shade, 100:50:0 kg NPK/ha was found to be optimal, recording a maximum dry weight yield of 2.16 tonnes/ha per year (Krishnamurthy et al., 2006).
Climate
Top of page| Climate | Status | Description | Remark | | Af - Tropical rainforest climate | Preferred | > 60mm precipitation per month | |
| Am - Tropical monsoon climate | Tolerated | Tropical monsoon climate ( < 60mm precipitation driest month but > (100 - [total annual precipitation(mm}/25])) | |
| As - Tropical savanna climate with dry summer | Tolerated | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in summer) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | |
| Aw - Tropical wet and dry savanna climate | Tolerated | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in winter) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | |
| Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year | Tolerated | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year | |
Latitude/Altitude
Top of page| Latitude North (°N) | Latitude South (°S) | Altitude Lower (m) | Altitude Upper (m) | | 45 | 40 | | |
Soil Tolerances
Top of pageSoil drainage
- impeded
- seasonally waterlogged
Soil reaction
Soil texture
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of page
In India, Cercospora centellae, Pseudomonas solanacearum, Cochliobolus geniculatus and Alternaria sp. have all been recorded on C. asiatica (Choudhury et al., 2012).
Devi (2009) recorded 21 nematode species on C. asiatica in Manipur, India, the commonest of which are listed in the table above.
Although not showing adverse reaction to infection by Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, C. asiatica acts as an alternate host and can be a source of infection for cruciferous crops (Kishun and Chand, 1988).
A number of other natural enemies are listed in the Table. None are thought to be especially damaging.
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Top of page
Accidental Introduction
Accidental introduction may occur on a local basis via garden waste, or contamination of nursery stock.
Intentional Introduction
As a highly favoured medicinal plant, intentional introduction has no doubt been at least partly responsible for the spread of C. asiatica over many centuries.
Pathway Causes
Top of page| Cause | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References | | Escape from confinement/ garden escape | | | Yes | |
| Garden waste disposal | | | Yes | |
| Medicinal use | | Yes | Yes | |
Pathway Vectors
Top of page| Vector | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References | | Machinery/equipment | | | Yes | |
| Plants or parts of plants | | Yes | Yes | |
Impact Summary
Top of page| Category | Impact | | Economic/livelihood | Positive and negative |
| Environment (generally) | Negative |
| Human health | Positive and negative |
Economic Impact
Top of page
C. asiatica is a widespread and very common weed in plantation crops, sometimes dominant, but rarely reported as causing significant crop damage. Crops in which it has been reported include tea-tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) in Australia (Virtue et al., 1993); lawns and turf in China (Lin et al., 2004); rice in India (e.g. Subudhi and Dixit, 1998), and orchids in USA (Crabtree, 1963).
It is generally regarded as a weed in tea plantations in India (e.g. Haridas and Sharma, 1973), though Perera (1955) considered it safe to use as a ground cover in the crop.
Environmental Impact
Top of page
Impact on Habitats
No information could be found to suggest C. asiatica causes serious change to habitats.
Impact on Biodiversity
C. asiatica can become quite dominant and smother low-growing vegetation, which can sometimes include species which are endangered or otherwise of special interest. In Hawaii, C. asiatica is among introduced species which have contributed to the decline of native sedges Carex thunbergii and Carex echinata (University of Hawaii, 1991).
Social Impact
Top of page
Although C. asiatica is the basis for ointments for skin diseases, handling the plant may cause skin irritation or even violent allergic reaction in some individuals, as described by Gomes et al. (2010). The pollen may also cause allergic reaction (Dave’s Garden, 2014).
Risk and Impact Factors
Top of pageImpact mechanisms
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Competition - smothering
Impact outcomes
- Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
- Modification of successional patterns
- Monoculture formation
- Negatively impacts agriculture
- Negatively impacts forestry
- Negatively impacts human health
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Threat to/ loss of native species
Invasiveness
- Abundant in its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Has high genetic variability
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Invasive in its native range
- Pioneering in disturbed areas
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Reproduces asexually
- Tolerant of shade
Uses
Top of page
Social Value
C. asiatica is very widely used as a fresh vegetable, for example in northern Laos (Kosaka et al., 2013) and in Bangladesh, where Islam et al. (2013) recorded favourably high levels of copper in C. asiatica.
C. asiatica is, however, known mainly for its medicinal uses. It is an important crop in Madagascar, where it is collected in the wild for its triterpenic glycoside compounds (Rakotondralambo et al., 2013). In the USA it is increasingly popular as a dietary supplement, where it is commonly available and sold as Gotu kola, Asiatic penny, Hydrocotyle or Brahmi (Techen et al., 2011).
There is a vast literature on the medicinal and other uses reviewed by WHO (1999): http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js2200e/10.html#Js2200e.10. Medicinal uses supported by clinical data include the treatment of wounds, burns and stomach ulcers.
Chong and Aziz (2013), in a detailed review of published evidence, concluded that C. asiatica may be beneficial for improving signs and symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI); however, this conclusion needs to be interpreted with caution as most of the studies were characterised by inadequate reporting. European Medicines Association (2014) concluded that the clinical efficacy of C. asiatica extract in the treatment of (CVI) was shown in different clinical studies, and reported no drug-related serious adverse events during the clinical trials.
Taghizadeh et al. (2004) reported major clinical indications for the use of C. asiatica in humans for the treatment of wounds, venous insufficiency of the limbs, certain mycobacterial infections and cellulitis.
There are further reviews of medicinal and other uses of C. asiatica by Jamil et al. (2007) and Gohil et al. (2010).
Other uses include potential as a monitor of barium and arsenic pollution in soil (Ong et al., 2013a,b).
Uses List
Top of pageHuman food and beverage
Medicinal, pharmaceutical
- Source of medicine/pharmaceutical
- Traditional/folklore
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of page
This species is very similar in habit and appearance to, and is sometimes mistaken for, Dichondra repens (Convolvulaceae) but the latter has more conspicuous 5-petalled white flowers and a less crenate leaf margin.
Hydrocotyle asiatica is still occasionally used as a synonym of C. asiatica, but Centella spp. are distinguished by the presence of small bracts subtending the umbels, absent in Hydrocotyle.
Prevention and Control
Top of page
Cultural Control and Sanitary Measures
Care is needed in the disposal of waste from gardens or plantations where the plant has been removed mechanically.
Physical/Mechanical Control
There are few specific reports but mechanical control by hoeing should be effective provided the loose plant material is removed to prevent re-establishment from the ramets.
Chemical Control
Tsai et al. (1987) reported C. asiatica susceptibility to glyphosate. Crabtree (1963) reported susceptibility to diuron, linuron and atrazine. Rochecouste and Vaughan (1963) reported it as resistant to MCPA and 2,4-D in Mauritius but other sources have indicated moderate susceptibility to these and other growth-regulating herbicides. Burt (1965) reported susceptibility of C. erecta to fenoprop and picloram.
References
Top of pageBurt EO, 1965. Postemergence control of weeds with herbicides. Report. Fla. agric. Exp. Stn. 316-17.
Chong NJ, Aziz Z, 2013. A systematic review of the efficacy of Centella asiatica for improvement of the signs and symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2013:Article ID 627182. http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ecam/2013/627182/
Choudhury D, Dasgupta B, Paul PC, 2012. Studies on leaf spot of Centella asiatica caused by Alternaria sp. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Minor Fruits and Medicinal Plants for Health and Ecological Security (ISMF & MP), West Bengal, India, 19-22 December, 2011 [ed. by Ghosh, S. N.]. Mohanpur, India: Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswandyalaya, 237-241.
Crabtree G, 1963. Research Progress Report. Western Weed Control Conference. 27-31 pp.
Dave's Garden, 2014. Dave's Garden. El Segundo, California, USA: Internet Brands. http://davesgarden.com
Devi NR, 2009. Plant parasitic nematodes associated with Indian pennywort Centella asiatica (L.) urban in Manipur. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 1(12):617-618. http://www.threatenedtaxa.org/ZooPrintJournal/2009/December/o211126xii09617-618.pdf
Devkota A, Jha PK, 2010. Seed germination responses of the medicinal herb Centella asiatica. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 22(2):143-150. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04202010000200008&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
Devkota A, Jha PK, 2013. Effect of integrated manuring on growth and yield of Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Tropical Ecology, 54(1):89-95.
Devkota A, Jha PK, 2014. Variation in growth of Centella asiatica along different soil composition. Botany Research International, 2(1):55-60.
Devkota A, Jhan PK, 2010. Effects of different light levels on the growth traits and yield of Centella asiatica. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 5(4):226-230. http://www.idosi.org/mejsr/mejsr5(4)/6.pdf
EOL, 2014. Encylopedia of Life. http://eol.org/
European Medicines Agency, 2014. Assessment report on Centella asiatica (L.) Urban, herba. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Herbal_-_HMPC_assessment_report/2012/06/WC500128144.pdf
Fernald ML, 1940. Some spermatophytes of eastern North America. Rhodora, 42:281-302.
Flora Zambesiaca, 2014. Flora Zambesiaca, Kew Databases. Richmond, UK: Royal Botanical Gardens Kew. http://apps.kew.org/efloras/fz/families.htm
Floridata, 2014. FLORIDATAbase website. Tallahassee, Florida, USA: Floridata.com. http://www.floridata.com/
Gandi S, Giri A, 2012. Genetic transformation of Centella asiatica by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Journal of Pharmacognosy, 3(2):82-84. http://www.bioinfo.in/uploadfiles/13476856573_2_10_JP.pdf
GBIF, 2014. GBIF data portal. Copenhagen, Denmark: Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). http://data.gbif.org
Gohil KJ, Patel JA, Gajjar AK, 2010. Pharmacological review on Centella asiatica: a potential herbal cure-all. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 72(5):546-556. http://www.ijpsonline.com/article.asp?issn=0250-474X;year=2010;volume=72;issue=5;spage=546;epage=556;aulast=Gohil
Gomes J, Pereira T, Vilarinho C, Duarte Mda L, Brito C, 2010. Contact dermatitis due to Centella asiatica. Contact Dermatitis, 62(1):54-55. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/cod
Grierson AJC, Long DG, 1999. Flora of Bhutan including a record of plants from Sikkim and Darjeeling. Vol. 2, Pt 2. Edinburgh, UK: Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh and Royal Government of Bhutan.
Hanumantharaya BG, Sathyanarayana BN, Arun WA, 2010. Efficient in vitro regeneration protocol as an aid to conserve wild population of Centella asiatica (L.) Dunal. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, 11(1/4):51-58. http://www.pcbmb.bravehost.com
Haridas P, Sharma VS, 1973. Some common weeds of South Indian tea fields. 11. Centella asiatica (L.) Urban and Drymaria diandra Blume. Planters' Chronicle, 68(22):475-476.
Hawaiian Tropical Plant Nursery, 2014. Hawaiian Tropical Plant Nursery. http://www.hawaiiantropicalplants.com/medicinal.html
Hou ZY, Xie YH, Chen XS, Li X, Li F, Pan Y, Deng ZM, 2011. Study on invasive plants in Dongting Lake wetlands. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 32(6):744-747.
Islam F, Bhattacharjee SC, Hossain A, Islam S, Mahmud ASM, Ahmed Y, Rahman M, 2013. Assessment of copper in diverse pulses, bananas, vegetables and arums of five upazila of Chittagong area in Bangladesh by spectro-photometric method. International Food Research Journal, 20(4):1867-1871. http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/20%20(04)%202013/49%20IFRJ%2020%20(04)%202013%20Faridul%20(262).pdf
Itow S, 1970. Centello-Zoysietum japonicae, a grazed grassland community in Kyushu, Japan. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 20(2):53-59.
IUCN, 2015. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/
Jamil SS, Qudsia N, Mehboobus S, 2007. Centella asiatica (Linn.) Urban - a review. Natural Product Radiance, 6(2):158-170. www.niscair.res.in
Joshi K, Chaturvedi P, Shubhpriya, 2013. Efficient in vitro regeneration protocol of Centella asiatica (L.) urban: an endemic and underutilized nutraceutical herb. African Journal of Biotechnology, 12(33):5164-5172. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB/abstracts/abs2013/14Aug/Joshi%20et%20al.htm
Kishun R, Chand R, 1988. Epiphytic survival of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris on Centella asiatica (L.) Urban. International Journal of Tropical Plant Diseases, 6(2):189-193
Kosaka Y, Xayvongsa L, Vilayphone A, Chanthavong H, Takeda S, Kato M, 2013. Wild edible herbs in paddy fields and their sale in a mixture in Houaphan Province, the Lao People's Democratic Republic. Economic Botany, 67(4):335-349. http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12231-013-9251-6
Krishnamurthy R, Chandorkar MS, Kalzunkar EG, Pathak JM, Rajendra Gupta, 2006. Studies on agronomic practices for growing Centella asiatica (L.) Urban in high rainfall localities under open and partial shade of mango orchards. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 63(1):76-80. http://www.hsi1942.org
Lin ZM, Chen JY, Lin MY, Chen ZH, Zhong YF, 2004. An update report on weed infestation of lawns and turf in Guangzhou and its control. Pratacultural Science, 21(6):68-72.
Mathur S, Sharma S, Kumar S, 2003. Description of variation in the Indian accessions of the medicinal plant Centella asiatica (L.) Urban. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, No.135:47-52.
Mathur S, Shasany AK, Darokar MP, Khanuja SPS, Kumar S, 1999. Registration of two cultivars of the medicinal/vegetable plant Centella asiatica. Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Sciences, 21(1):54-55.
Missouri Botanical Garden, 2014. Tropicos database. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden. http://www.tropicos.org/
Ong GH, Yap CK, Maziah M, Suhaimi H, Tan SG, 2013. An investigation of arsenic contamination in Peninsular Malaysia based on Centella asiatica and soil samples. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185(4):3243-3254. http://rd.springer.com/journal/10661
Ong GH, Yap CK, Maziah M, Tan SG, Suhaimi H, 2013. Barium levels in soils and Centella asiatica. Tropical Life Sciences Research, 24(1):55-70. http://ernd.usm.my/journal/journal/TLSR24_1_61.pdf
Perera SS, 1955. Gotukola-as a cover crop for tea. Tea Quarterly, 26:148-9.
PFAF, 2015. Plants For A Future. http://www.pfaf.org/user/Default.aspx
PIER, 2014. Pacific Islands Ecosystems at Risk. Honolulu, USA: HEAR, University of Hawaii. http://www.hear.org/pier/index.html
Rakotondralambo SOR, Rodier-Goud M, Rivallan R, Lussert A, Danthu P, Lamotte Fde, Ralambofetra E, Ramavovololona P, Noyer JL, Baurens FC, 2013. Insight into the biology, genetics and evolution of the Centella asiatica polyploid complex in Madagascar. Industrial Crops and Products, 47:118-125. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926669013001027
Rochecouste E, Vaughan RE, 1963. Leaflet. Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute, Nos. 7 & 8. 5 pp.
Sangwan RS, Sandhya Tripathi, Jyoti Singh, Narnoliya LK, Sangwan NS, 2013. De novo sequencing and assembly of Centella asiatica leaf transcriptome for mapping of structural, functional and regulatory genes with special reference to secondary metabolism. Gene, 525(1):58-76. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378111913005544
Singh P, Singh JS, 2002. Recruitment and competitive interaction between ramets and seedlings in a perennial medicinal herb, Centella asiatica. Basic and Applied Ecology, 3(1):65-76.
Subudhi HN, Dixit N, 1998. Weed flora of rice fields in Orissa. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany, 22(3):737-739.
Taghizadeh M, Yasa N, Naqinezhad A, Ahvazi M, 2004. Review of Centella asiatica (L.) urban. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 3(12):1-8. http://www.imp.ac.ir
Techen N, Joshi VC, Rumalla CS, Khan IA, 2011. Validation of the medicinal plant Centella asiatica (l.) Urb. and detection of its possible substitutes. Planta Medica, 77:10.
Thong-on W, Arimatsu P, Pitiporn S, Soonthornchareonnon N, Prathanturarug S, 2014. Field evaluation of in vitro-induced tetraploid and diploid Centella asiatica (L.) urban. Journal of Natural Medicines, 68(2):267-273. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11418-013-0761-4
Tsai WF, Chang SS, Wang SM, 1987. Weed control by ethylenediamine and isopropylamine salts of glyphosate. Memoirs of the College of Agriculture, National Taiwan University, 27(1):8-14.
University of Hawaii, 1991. Studies in montane bogs of Haleakala National Park. Technical Report 76-78. Hawaii, USA: Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit of University of Hawaii at Manoa, 33.
USDA-ARS, 2014. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2014. The PLANTS Database. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov/
Virtue JG, Sutton BG, Cousens RD, Murtagh GJ, 1993. Weed interference in tea tree plantations. In: Proceedings I of the 10th Australian Weeds Conference and 14th Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 6-10 September, 1993 [ed. by Wilson, B. J.\Swarbrick, J. T.]. Queensland, Australia: Queensland Weed Society, 261-264.
Watson MF, 1999. Family 144. Umbelliferae. In: Flora of Bhutan, 2(2) [ed. by Grierson, A. J. C. \Long, D. G.]. Edinburgh, UK: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 434-504.
WHO, 1999. WHO monographs on selected medicinal plants. Volume 1. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, v + 289 pp.
Zhang XG, Han T, He ZG, Zhang QY, Zhang L, Rahman K, Qin LP, 2012. Genetic diversity of Centella asiatica in China analyzed by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: combination analysis with chemical diversity. Journal of Natural Medicines, 66(1):241-247. http://www.springerlink.com/content/5168518q838jv03n/
Contributors
Top of page
12/06/14 Original text by:
Chris Parker, consultant, UK
Distribution Maps
Top of page
- = Present, no further details
- = Evidence of pathogen
- = Widespread
- = Last reported
- = Localised
- = Presence unconfirmed
- = Confined and subject to quarantine
- = See regional map for distribution within the country
- = Occasional or few reports