Cookies on VetMed Resource

Like most websites we use cookies. This is to ensure that we give you the best experience possible.

Continuing to use www.cabi.org means you agree to our use of cookies. If you would like to, you can learn more about the cookies we use.

CABI Animal Welfare Symposium - 'The Human Animal Bond' 21 June 2017, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK

CABI Animal Welfare Symposium - 'Animals Behaving Badly' 27 June 2017, UC Davis, California, USA

News Article

Effects of conservation management on Lyme disease risk


Conservation management actions, including deer management, woodland regeneration, invasive species management and urban greening, could affect Lyme disease risk in the UK.

A study published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, found that some types of conservation action could increase the abundance of ticks, which transmit diseases like Lyme disease.

The research, led by the University of Glasgow in collaboration with Scottish Natural Heritage, the James Hutton Institute and Public Health England, examined how conservation management activities could affect tick populations, wildlife host communities, the transmission of the Borrelia bacteria that can cause Lyme disease and, ultimately, the risk of contracting Lyme disease.

The study found that managing the environment for conservation and biodiversity has many positive effects, including benefits for human health and wellbeing from spending time in nature; however the researchers suggested that there should be consideration of disease vectors such as ticks and mosquitoes in conservation management decisions.

Lead author Dr Caroline Millins, from the University of Glasgow’s School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine (BAHCM), said, “We found that some management activities could lead to an increased risk of Lyme disease by increasing the habitat available for wildlife hosts and the tick vector. These activities were woodland regeneration and biodiversity policies which increase the amount of forest bordering open areas as well as urban greening.”

“However, if deer populations are managed alongside woodland regeneration projects, this can reduce tick populations and the risk of Lyme disease.”

Deer are often key to maintaining tick populations, but do not become infected with the bacteria. Previous research by co-author Lucy Gilbert of The James Hutton Institute has shown that greatly reducing deer densities by exclusion fencing or culling can reduce tick density and therefore Lyme disease risk.

Senior author Dr Roman Biek, University of Glasgow’s BAHCM, said, “Widespread management activities can potentially teach us a lot about how changes to the environment can affect the chances of humans coming into contact with ticks and with the pathogens ticks transmit. We recommend that monitoring ticks and pathogens should accompany conservation measures such as woodland regeneration and urban greening projects. This will allow appropriate guidelines and mitigation strategies to be developed, while also helping us to better understand the processes leading to higher Lyme disease risk.”

Read article: Effects of conservation management of landscapes and vertebrate communities on Lyme borreliosis risk in the United Kingdom by Caroline Millins, Lucy Gilbert, Jolyon Medlock, Kayleigh Hansford, Des BA Thompson and Roman Biek is published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B (2017) 372: 20160123, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0123.

Article details

  • Date
  • 11 May 2017
  • Source
  • University of Glasgow
  • Subject(s)
  • Zoo-, Wild-, Laboratory-, and Other Animals